Vava projector 4k11/19/2023 ![]() The Optoma's lens has a slightly longer 0.25:1 throw ratio and puts up a 100-inch image with the audience-facing grille about 25 inches from the screen. The VAVA's lens has a 0.23:1 throw ratio and throws a 100-inch diagonal 16:9 image with the audience-facing front grille of the projector about 22 inches from the screen. A trade-off is that a shorter throw ratio makes it harder to maintain perfect focus uniformity, especially out toward the top corners of the screen. A shorter throw ratio means the projector can sit closer, which is more desirable and limits how far you might need to pull your resting furniture off the wall. For a UST projector, the lens throw ratio determines the distance the projector must be placed from the screen for a given image size. It's really just a matter of taste which projector's aesthetic you prefer. The VAVA is available in white or black, while the Optoma is strictly white. The Optoma might be considered more high tech with its convex front grille. The VAVA has the slightly smaller width and overall footprint, and a more Scandinavian look with its rounded corners. The VAVA 4K and Optoma CinemaX P2 both feature a modern console design. You should also refer to our full reviews of the VAVA 4K and Optoma CinemaX P2, and to the comparison engine from our Find a Projector database that shows side-by-side specs for both projectors. It is a dark gray screen material with a 0.6 gain, so it sacrifices a considerable amount of peak brightness that is more than made up for by its exceptional deepening of black and improved contrast in both high-ambient-light and dark conditions. The Aeon CLR, like most UST ALR screens, has a sawtooth optical construction that accepts light from directly below the screen and reflects it straight out to the viewer while rejecting overhead ambient light. As part of my testing, I did simultaneous, on-screen comparisons of the same SDR and HDR images for both projectors. My analysis here is based on my prior experience reviewing both projectors and fresh evaluations of each model with its current firmware as projected onto a 100-inch Elite Aeon CLR ambient-light-rejecting UST screen. Whether it's worth it to you will depend on what you value. I also believe strongly that the combined differences between these projectors in picture, features, and ergonomics more than justify the extra cost for the P2. I'll go ahead and spare some of you from reading a lengthy review by stating right up front that the Optoma is the better projector in nearly all respects, especially image quality. ![]() That question is different than whether the premium for the P2, $500 on a normal day without sales, is worth the money. Not surprisingly, we get frequent mail asking about the differences between the VAVA and the Optoma P2 and inquiring which is better.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |